Hook Logo
Search

ESSAY- Lady Gaga: And the Pornification of America


Published September 16, 2010 in issue 0937 of the Hook
Bookmark and Share

With a record-breaking 17 million fans on Facebook, a chart-topping 5 million followers and the most popular hashtext on twitter (#becauseofgaga), the most watched YouTube video, and more than $34 million in ticket sales from her Monster Ball Tour, Lady Gaga, a.k.a. the artist formerly known as Stefani Germanotta, is undeniably a musical force to be reckoned with. At least for the moment.

Nominated for 13 MTV Music Video Awards, including four for "Bad Romance" (which has been viewed over 276 million times on YouTube and enough traffic to ground Gaga's website to a halt), Gaga knows how to fill seats, sell albums, and incite a frenzied devotion among her followers, whom she affectionately refers to as "Little Monsters."

The emphasis is on the "little." With a fan base dominated by the under-20 set (her Facebook fans mainly range from 10-21), the driving force behind Gaga's popularity and success comes from kid power. Yet the content of Gaga's music and videos is far from kid-friendly, and the impact on young female fans is particularly troublesome.

Indeed, Gaga admits that "the last thing a young woman needs is another picture of a sexy pop star writhing in sand, covered in grease, touching herself." However, if one replaces "sand" with "brothel floor" and "grease" with "diamonds," Gaga is precisely "another sexy pop star," albeit one whose hyper-sexualized façade has sped the pornification of American culture.

As theatre historian and University of Illinois professor Mardia Bishop explains, "pop culture and porn culture have become part of the same seamless continuum." Given the youth of Gaga's fanbase, however, the increasing acceptability and pervasiveness of sexualized imagery in mainstream media— "normalization" Bishop calls it--- is where the Gaga phenomenon takes a dark turn.

"Visual images and narratives of music videos clearly have more potential to form attitudes, values, or perceptions of social reality than does the music alone," notes author Douglas A. Gentile in Media Violence and Children, "because they add additional information and rely less on imagination."

For example, Gaga's "Bad Romance" video packs a lot of messages into a five-minute musical. The singer is kidnapped, drugged, and forced to sell herself as a prostitute to the highest bidder; and the video ends with a scantily clad, post-coitally-posed Gaga lying on a bed beside the smoldering skeleton of her "customer" as her bra emits flames.

That said, Gaga is far from the only mainstream artist contributing to the pornification of young children. Children between the ages of 8 and 18 spend approximately 30-120 minutes a day watching music videos— 75 percent of which contain sexually suggestive materials. And with the advent of portable technology, children's television and music are often unmonitored by parents or guardians. Not only does this accelerate adolescent sexual behavior (as 12- to 14-year-old girls are two times more likely to engage in sexual activity after being exposed to sexual imagery), but it increases the likelihood of more sexual partners.

Nancy Bauer, a Tufts University professor, note that celebrity adoration is a normal part of identity development for young girls, but such adoration can manifest itself from something as simple as putting up posters to more destructive behaviors, such as starving oneself to mimic a celebrity's body shape.

Thus, to younger children, Lady Gaga crawling around on the floor in diamonds and giving a lap dance to an emotionally distant male stranger becomes the embodiment of Gaga behavior— to be studied and emulated.

The image of Gaga with overly large, computer-generated eyes in "Bad Romance" has given rise to a whole new craze in eyewear: circle lenses. After the video premiered, a professional make-up artist and spokesperson for Lancome, Michelle Phan, uploaded a "How To" video teaching girls how to achieve a similar look.

The video, which calls for five layers of false lashes, two eyeliners, brow gel, three different eye shadows, a brow pencil, circle contact lenses, and an anti-inflammatory "not meant for daily use," received over 12 million hits. "Nice," commented one user. "I want to do this look but I'am just 11 years old!!!" While the American Optometric Association cautioned that the lenses provide the potential for irreversible sight loss, a 16-year-old admits to owning 22 pairs.

Anything they see-- whether it's Gaga caged up with vertebrate sticking out of her back or seducing and then murdering a male counterpart in "Bad Romance"-- can be accepted as fact. "I don't even drink water onstage in front of anybody," Gaga admits, "because I want them to focus on the fantasy of the music."

But as professor Bauer notes, too many of Gaga's fans see her as such a real role model "that they could be her." This relationship that veers too close to personal projection, and Gaga reinforces the perception through carefully choreographed behavior, appearing to show genuine love and an almost motherly concern for her fans.

"What I'm really trying to say,"  she tells one interviewer, "is I want the deepest, darkest, sickest parts of you that you are afraid to share with anyone because I love you that much."

Gaga also manages to create a sense of intimacy and reciprocity in what is traditionally a non-reciprocal relationship, constantly attributing her success and happiness to her fans. For example, Gaga tattooed "Little Monsters" on her forearm, tweeting, "Look what I did last night. Little monsters forever, on the arm that holds my mic." In response, one fan gushed, "If I ever meet YOU, I'm going to get your signature tattooed on me too!!" Another states, "I wish we could sit down together and talk about all this stuff together. You would love the stories I have! And I know you'd believe me."

This pseudo-reciprocal relationship, then, is foundational to Gaga's pervasive impact. After all, when fans are imbued with a sense of importance, they become ravenous consumers of associated commercial products. Yet, in an ironic take on "Bad Romance," in the end, it's Gaga's young fans who are getting sold to the highest bidder.

Gaga's once obscure fashion has come to inspire Prada, Armani, and Alexander Wang. Nude corsets, lace, bodysuits, feathers, and "the pantsless look" have all been featured on the runways. Particular materials— corsets, high-heels, leather, rubber, fur, and underwear as outerwear are all commonly used in the porn industry, and all appear in Gaga's "Bad Romance."

These fashions, like fashions of the past, trickle down to reach young girls— which explains how sexually provocative slogans like "Feeling Lucky" find themselves stamped on the backs of underwear marketed to 7-year-olds.

~

The author is the founder and director of the Albemarle-based Rutherford Institute, a non-profit legal clinic advancing civil and religious rights.

#

Comments

                     
HarryD9/16/2010 8:50:44 PM

John- you are so right. This is a "person" who really could care less about what is to follow in her footsteps.

She'll make her money and run as soon as her promoter sees the bucks stop rolling in.

Nelson9/16/2010 9:28:46 PM

America and the world survived Madonna. We'll survive Lady Gaga. I'm sure the Andrews Sisters must have been scandalous in their day.

Luigi9/17/2010 12:10:11 AM

"Children between the ages of 8 and 18 spend approximately 30-120 minutes a day watching music videos."

Did you pull this entirely out of thin air?

It's completely absurd.

terrence9/17/2010 2:33:58 AM

Excellent essay. Tha's exactly what is going on. It's sad. The Andrew Sisters relied on talent, i.e. their singing. Gaga is one of the push-button cheap tricks to get famous culture. She not only ain't a Lady, she's not an artist either.

Jake Dekay9/17/2010 9:17:33 AM

lady gaga clearly has talent, listen to her voice, so that argument is pointless. i guess people who aren't struggling with their sexuality, or oppressed can't ever get the full meaning of her music.

boooo!9/17/2010 9:24:06 AM

@Jake Dekay

I would think that truly good music could be appreciated by everybody. Not just "people struggling with their sexuality" or those are "oppressed." But that's just me!

boooo!9/17/2010 9:24:44 AM

* or those who are "oppressed."

Rhino9/17/2010 9:43:38 AM

I dont believe her music or stage performance is FOR this demographic. She is targeting anyone who feels to the left of 'blacksheeped' society. Of which I am one. A GAY man. And her presence and music//art//being helps ME.ME!. Accept that I was 'born this way'. parenting starts with the parents. cant believe this article exists. really?!

JJ Malloy9/17/2010 10:16:16 AM

She tried to make it as a Norah Jones type. She realized she wasn't going anywhere cuz there were far more talented and sexier women out there doing the same thing.

She gets together with her marketing team, and boom a year later she reappears as this Madonna on steroids. What an artist...

boooo!9/17/2010 11:07:54 AM

@ JJ Malloy

"She gets together with her marketing team, and boom a year later she reappears as this Madonna on steroids. What an artist..."

Actually, it could be worse than that.

_____

http://www.henrymakow.com/lina_morgana_leftby_richard_ev.html

"Lina Morgana collaborated with Stephani Germanotta [Lady Gaga] during 2007 until falling ten stories to her death in New York October 6, 2008 at age 19. [...] Lina

'Morgana' (a witch name) was on the verge of her own music career taking off. Lots of images and her music is available on youtube, so her mother's claim that Gaga took her blond look, makeup, stage act, and several songs when she was still just Stephani Germanotta holds up. [...] Stephani became Gaga and her career took off one month after Morgana's death...."

_____

Make of it what you will. People may take issue with Henry Makow's material as a whole, and there's faults to be found in the unprofessional style of this guest article contribution that he's featuring, but you know what they say about "throwing the baby out with the bathwater." This is an interesting revelation about Gaga, if it's indeed true.

HollowBoy9/17/2010 1:59:04 PM

Seeing here the age-old patriarchal view that sex is bad, and that women's bodies are dirty and evil, and must be kept hidden.

The irony is that both the porn industry and prudes who denounce pornography hold the same view of women- that they are evil, and deserve anything bad or degrading that happens to them.

Read Linda Lovelace's book about her life in the porn industry(understand there is going to be a movie about her).Or Andrea Dworkin's book Woman Hating.

Some feminists like people like Madonna, and some do not, and both present interesting arguments in support of their positions.

Like Madonna, Lady GaGa has a gay male following. For much the same reasons.

The patriarchal double standard is still going strong.Women who express their sexuality are calles "sluts" or "skanks." While men are "studs" if they bed a lot of women and are called "real men" as opposed to those others.

I once knew a heterosexual woman who would attend dances held by the UVA gay students group, because as she explained these men treated her with respect and she could enjoy dancing without having to worry about unwanted advances.

If the Rutherford Institute is a civil rights group, where is a column advocating repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, and "don't ask, don't tell" in the military?

HarryD9/19/2010 7:15:26 AM

Jake Dekay- tell me about the full meaning of her "music"....

tatiana9/19/2010 2:50:13 PM

es maestra


Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but language stronger than "darn," insulting words like "stupid," ethnically or racially disparaging language, and comparing people to Hitler usually results in deletion of the comment and may get you blocked from further commenting. Ditto for posting unverified and/or potentially libelous allegations, and even off-topic digression. And to avoid spam, any comment containing more than two weblinks gets eaten by Bigfoot.



© 2002-2010 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: