Hook Logo

Noon mark: Mall to get new $25,000 clock, sundial

by Dave McNair
(434) 295-8700 x239
published 11:59am Tuesday Jan 25, 2011
Bookmark and Share letter Write a letter to the editor

onarch-clock_webEd Smith’s proposed timepiece and teaching tool.
ED SMITH

Back in August 2009, the City launched a design contest for the creation of a clock on the Downtown Mall that would honor Charlottesville’s relationship to its three Sister Cities and cost less than $25,000. Since then, a couple of things have changed: we’ve added another Sister, and it appears the clock will actually get built.

If you’re having trouble keeping track, the Sister cities would be Besançon, France; Pleven, Bulgaria; Poggio a Caiano, Italy; and the newcomer, Winneba, Ghana.

At the time of the contest announcement, officials weren’t sure if the winning design would get built, a reminder of the 2007 design contest that cost $150,000 in taxpayer funds to generate ideas for the development of the Water Street parking lots where nothing ever got built.

In November 2009, a jury of architects, artists, and business people selected a winning clock: a 12-foot tall granite obelisk called the “Meridian Clock.” Envisioned by local designer Edward P. Smith and headed for a location between the Transit Center and City Hall, it would include various timepieces including a noon mark, a simple sundial to note each day’s noon.

“I’m an amateur astronomer and geographer,” says Smith, who took home the $1,500 prize. “That summer I had been messing around with types of noon marks and using the sun to find True North when I happened to read about the competition. I thought, ‘This could work.’”

In addition to second and third place designs by Paul Tassell of the Gaines Group and Michael Stoneking, who received $1,000 and $500 for their efforts, there was also a ‘”people’s  choice” award winner by a trio of local designers— Bill Hess, Jim Respess, and Bob Anderson—selected after a public viewing at City Space. That one would have included four video screens showing real-time images from the four Sister Cities. Tassell’s design featured a clock high atop a slim brick tower across from the Landmark hotel site, while Stoneking’s clock sat atop a stout kiosk. There were ten entries in all.

Two and a half years ago, Neighborhood development chief Jim Tolbert suggested that construction costs could be covered by “left-over Downtown Mall re-bricking funds.” Last month, however, City Council decided to build Smith’s clock with a $25,000 budget Tolbert now says will come from a percentage of the city’s public art account.

The Meridian Clock [7mg PDF] will be placed on a meridian line, a one-foot-wide strip of granite built into the brick surface that will run true North and South, all the way from the stairs of the Transit Center to a planting bed near the entrance to City Hall. It will operate like a sundial that marks winter and summer solstices, spring and fall equinoxes, and months of the year. There will also be two electric, analog clocks embedded atop of what Smith calls a “decidedly modern” and “deceptively simple” obelisk.

The structure will include seals identifying the Sister Cities, but it’s the solar-powered “teaching tool” aspect that seems to thrill Smith the most.

“I’m very excited,” says Smith. “While public sundials are fairly common, as far as I can tell, this type of noon mark will be wholly unique to Charlottesville.”

Of course, no structural change on the Mall would be complete without the Board of Architectural Review making their mark on it.

“Ed is currently working on final details to bring back for BAR approval,” says city design planner Mary Joy Scala, who says construction will begin after the 2011 Charlottesville Pavilion music season, “but it should look the same.”

According to BAR vice chair Syd Knight, the Board asked Smith to “refine a few details” and offer more specific information about the color and finish of the granite and the placement of the Sister City seals.

“Once the details are resolved,” says Knight, “I think this will be a very nice addition to the Mall.”

Others aren’t quite as impressed.

Back in 2009, frequent Mall visitor Kevin Cox thought it was a “poor way to spend 25k,” but predicted that the City “would do it anyway.”

“It’s a silly idea for an expensive, archaic monument,” says Cox today. “I think they ought to erect a smartphone tower instead.” Cox also expresses concern about the “chaotic architectural themes” on the east end of the Mall and thinks the obelisk will add significantly to the overall clash of design styles.

“There are a number of bold and distinctive elements already in place at that end of the Mall,” says Knight, “but I think that the basic design of the clock fits its context. One of the strengths of the Mall’s design is that it is simple and bold enough to accommodate strong ideas without being overwhelmed.”

However, given the current state of the economy, Charlottesville native Toni Roades isn’t especially impressed by the clock project either.

“Even if my property taxes hadn’t been raised 15 percent the year that City property values plunged 15 percent, and even if my household’s City tax burden didn’t exceed 20 percent of my household’s net income, and even if I hadn’t fallen seven times in the last dozen or so years because of ill-maintained and/or non existent City sidewalks,” she writes in an email, “I would be appalled at this truly World-Class waste of public money and civic capital.”

Updated: 1/27/2011 10:47am

open

55 comments

  • CC at its best January 25th, 2011 | 12:24 pm

    CC should change the shape of the 12 obelisk just a little, ad the BOS as co-sponsors, rub it down with petroleum jelly and formally present it to the tax payers of cvill and albemarle county as a monument of gratitude for all their hard work.

  • Restore the Republic January 25th, 2011 | 1:02 pm

    That’s funny CC!

    Or, perhaps they could erect a 12-foot digitus medius and point it towards Washington, DC to honor Charlottesville’s relationship with their sister wasteful government.

    At least if the new planned mega dam springs a leak they’ll have a place to stick the obelisk.

  • Mickiemac January 25th, 2011 | 1:10 pm

    What a foolish waste of money - again! With all the electronic gadgets that most everyone carries with them, they certainly won’t know how to tell the time from the proposed ‘clock’ unless it’s displayed in a digital format. Maybe all the homeless people on the mall can use it to guess what time their next meal will be.

    Squandering money on this type of nonsense seems to be par for the course in C’ville.

  • confused easily January 25th, 2011 | 1:40 pm

    The sun dial will be useful to those waiting on the smelly city buses nearby. Both are prime examples of archaic technology that the City continues to utilize in the present day.

  • cookieJar January 25th, 2011 | 1:43 pm

    One more reason for a recall effort.

  • Downtown Businessman January 25th, 2011 | 1:46 pm

    I like it.

  • confused easily January 25th, 2011 | 1:48 pm

    I already use the Landmark Hotel as my own personal sundial.

  • Shannon January 25th, 2011 | 1:49 pm

    Like. It adds aura.

  • Shannon January 25th, 2011 | 1:52 pm

    I’ll take ancient wisdom and archaic any day over a stupid smartphone tower.

  • boooo! January 25th, 2011 | 1:52 pm

    Strange looking transportation center, even stranger looking pavilion, a strange freedom of speech chalk wall full of pointless idiocies, then a random clock and sundial thrown in the middle of all of it to tell time when everybody has either a watch or a cell phone…..hahaha!

    Funny how no matter how many protests something gets, the city is just gonna do what it’s gonna do, and nobody can stop them. Even funnier how the incoming councils and department leads, no matter how seemingly diverse, male or female, different races, different backgrounds, different generational ages, **they always seem to be in line with strange spending choices and nonsensical decisions and vote or sign off on things that are not in the residents’ best interests.**

    Really makes you wonder, doesn’t it, how it could be possible that all these various department heads and Council members, despite their diverse backgrounds, cultures and ages, could consistently be against **common sense** and **prudent spending choices** and **the City’s best interests.** I mean, consistently.

    You know, it’s almost like it’s a conspiracy or something. Really, it is. “Things that make you go hmmmm.”

  • Hoover January 25th, 2011 | 1:54 pm

    This is a joke right?

  • boooo! January 25th, 2011 | 2:16 pm

    To elaborate on my previous point - it’s almost like these department leads and/or council members are paid off, or make a deal with someone/something, or are programmed in some way to agree with strange nonsensical practices that serve to **drive the city into the ground.** Really, it’s like they’re purposely **trying** to create the fiscal downfall of this city. How else to explain a long list of fiscally draining decisions, some of them made AFTER it was announced how the city was going to be experiencing budget shortfalls starting in the next couple of years. (Included on that list of fiscally irreponsible and draining decisions would be the pointless “Dialogue on Race” initiative, which only serves to create the illusion that “something is being done about race relations” to the tune of well over ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS in employees salaries/consultant fees, food, supplies, advertising, etc.) the “CLDA” employee program to give motivation to “Emerging Charlottesville Leaders” to the tune of TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, the “Emergenetics” employee personality profiling so employees can discover how much people skills they have and whether they’re naturally organized, to the tune of THOUSANDS of dollars total (and not even counting lost man power, as the city employees are away taking their personality profiling and training during work time on the taxpayers’ dime), and on and on and on.

    Really, you have to wonder about all this. ;)

  • Gasbag Self Ordained Expert January 25th, 2011 | 2:54 pm

    A 12-foot tall granite obelisk doesn’t cost anywhere near $25,000, even with delivery and installation.

    I wonder who’s taking the city for a ride on this purchase?

  • cookieJar January 25th, 2011 | 3:08 pm

    The article doesn’t actually say what the cost will be, just that the budget was $25,000. There is also the cost of the granite strip to consider.

    I wonder what the bids are/will be, but since the budget has already been made public, the city has destroyed any negotiating position it may have had. Seems to be something they specialize in. I won’t be surprised if they spend more in the end.

  • To All January 25th, 2011 | 4:50 pm

    Just not the right time. The sundial is a cool idea to explain to kids how folks used to tell time. Ms. Roades gets my vote for telling it like it is. Why can’t we all just get along…

  • Family Values January 25th, 2011 | 6:23 pm

    This type of wasteful nonsense is at least partly responsible for the Ruckersville Renaissance. People are leaving “Cville” in droves. Drive through Ruckersville one day soon. It is a boomtown! New construction everywhere, Restaurants, retail, and rentals galore. No need to waste gas to go to “town” anymore. If you lived in Ruckersville, you’d be home now.

  • doooooh! January 25th, 2011 | 6:33 pm

    I know what y’all mean. That mall, there, is full of odd people, with their **store-bought haircuts** and **spectacles**. Makes me nervous, I’ll tell ya.

  • Barbara Myer January 25th, 2011 | 7:05 pm

    I have some vague recollection that some minute but set percentage of either new construction or renovation or both is requred by city law or ordinance or charter to be spent on public art. Whether this particular project should be funded or not is debatable, but I think they’re mandated to spend the money on some kind of art.

  • ontheroad33 January 25th, 2011 | 7:13 pm

    When decorating and you are not sure what to put there, make it a clock! Goodwill has dozens.

  • Mrs T January 25th, 2011 | 10:20 pm

    A $25,000 phallic symbol is just what Charlottesville deserves.

  • Bill Marshall January 25th, 2011 | 11:36 pm

    The drawing does not do it justice… just imagine how nice it will be with posters all over it promoting all the bands playing, new resturants, outdoor sporting events, political campaigns and yard sales.

    If they want to teach us about how we used to do things that we have in common with our “sister cities” why not just install an outhouse? It would cost less to build and they would have somewhere to throw the leftover money.

  • town regular January 25th, 2011 | 11:59 pm

    @cookie jar: C.I.P funds, Tax payer money

  • nice January 26th, 2011 | 12:07 am

    Just imagine what it will look like when the spring comes. A bunch of young people enjoying the place, how cool it is and friendly. Where are all the old creeps? Prackiting Richcraft.

  • Sam January 26th, 2011 | 10:44 am

    Thanks so much for giving the tea party and Repubs. something else to hit us over the head with. We Dems might as well get ready for another shellacking in the next election. Where are the socially liberal but fiscally conservative democrats in C-ville? We need to get more fiscally conservative or we will see George Allen back.

  • Cville Eye January 26th, 2011 | 11:48 am

    @boooo! this is how it all happens. For the convenience of candidates not having to do fund raising for their campaigns, The majority of the money comes from individuals who write checks for hundreds, even thousands of dollars. They are usually called the old heads. They usually have a fund raiser in late winter or so called a spaghetti dinner where Black people are told they can eat for free. As pay back tor this easy money, Council has to support the special projects of the main contributors: Sister Cities, Legal Aid, historic districts, roof top gardens, ex-con voting rights, etc. Notice that ASAP was given $11k to provide the city with information it has never used nor intends to.
    @Barbara Myer, no actually the art fund is not as formal as that. It is really a Council guideline that says that a certain percentage of certain types of CIP funds will automatically go into this fund. It is actualy voted on every year when Council votes on the guidelines. I believe it was something put together by K. Slaughter and S. Huja and subsequently supported by Maurice Cox.
    @Bill Marshall, outhouse comment is delicious.
    @Sam, “…socially liberal but fiscally conservative democrats in C-ville…” we don’t have any. We have learned to borrow money to buy what we want and pay for it later. That is why Council is looking for new ways of finding funds for bonds. That is why the school board (all Democrats) wants $36M to move the6th grade back in with the 7th and 8th graders, where they were in 1974. They would have us believe that it is detrimental to the education of the fifth and sixth graders if they share a building.
    @Everyone, how long will Syd Knight serve on the BAR spewing out hot air? And, actually, the obelisk will be the most attractive thing on the east end of the Mall even if I don’t think this is a good expenditure. Instead of spending time worrying about a clock, Council should be worrying about the debacle at Ragged Mountain. I guess these are the more important things that Council would like to spend its time on, fluff and frill. The Charlottesville voter always get exactly what he deserves. David Brown, Blake Caravati’s lackey, are you listening or are you still oblivious?

  • Gonzo G January 26th, 2011 | 12:33 pm

    I like it.

    But I’m sure the mall dogs will like it more.

    It’ll be a great pee-mail hotspot.

  • Elgin Rolex January 26th, 2011 | 1:03 pm

    Is there such a thing as a World Ass city?

    There is now.

  • JeffC January 26th, 2011 | 3:02 pm

    Agreed, yet another huge waste of money. Maybe the’ll also put a huge sign 20 feet from it to point it our. Can’t wait to see the chalk graffitti all over it, whoo hoo!

  • Barbara Myer January 26th, 2011 | 6:55 pm

    So — how much money is sitting in the ‘art fund’? Could we buy something really cool, or does this pretty much empty the fund and we won’t have to kvetch about this next year?

    It kinda’ amazes me that we think artists aren’t local, don’t count, and frequently don’t make less than most of the rest of us. Artists do silly things like taking over McGuffey when no one else thinks it’s worth it. Or Baltimore’s Inner Harbor. Or, say, all of Detoit today. Or our downtown mall twenty years ago. Or Belmont ten years ago.

    Tons of people, who aren’t artists, make money on the positive energy artists create. Artists regularly get priced out of real estate no one wanted, until they took it over, improved real estate values, and were unable to contine to live there because the neighborhoods were now ‘desirable’. Artists are monstrously effective rehabilitation engines.

    We should have some public art. Public art is why many of us travel to Europe. Public, being Kings and stuff. Now Kings have become democracies. $25K isn’t going to lay Charlottesville taxpayers low. The sort of thing that will do that is the Federal government no longer paying for services to the addicted and mentally imapired and the homeless. Oh, yes, and the schools in the form of NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. Oh, yes, and the state housing prisoners in our local jail at “expense only” rates, disregarding the cost of building the jail — that’s just outsourced to the localities and not reimbursed by the state.

    Really, people, argue that it isn’t good art, if that’s what you would like to do, but don’t argue that art is expendable. I have no idea what ‘art’ is, but I know it makes me human. And I know we should invest in humanity. And I really know I’d prefer any of my tax dollars go to ‘art’ than to, oh say hanging Saddam Hussein. Which is a thing my government (at least one of them) has made me invest in.

  • Amigo1 January 26th, 2011 | 7:24 pm

    JeffC I am woth ylu on the new giant signs everywhere. What a waste and what giamt eyesores. Who thlught they were a good idea?

  • Daniel January 26th, 2011 | 7:56 pm

    All this complaining. C’mon now. 25K is not much money. It’s 60 cents from each of us for something that will last, I don’t know, thousands of years. That amortizes to .00000006 cents a year. Just skip the next supersize and put up with the medium fries for once (you get refills on the soda anyway) and you’ve got it covered.

  • Cville Eye January 26th, 2011 | 10:00 pm

    @Daniel, you’re right $25k isn’t that much money. Why don’t you pay it and we’ll catch you the next time around when a lot of money is being spent?

  • Cville Eye January 26th, 2011 | 10:40 pm

    @Barbara Myer , maybe some people are saying that they haven’t seen any public art around here and they are tired of their money being spent on what someone else thinks is art. That’s one of the arguments against “public art.” Perhpas if it were donated?

  • Hoover January 27th, 2011 | 7:40 am

    Daniel: Send me $25,000.00 It isn’t that much money to you, but, to me it would be a major financial help. So, howabout it?

  • boooo! January 27th, 2011 | 8:13 am

    @ Daniel

    “It’s 60 cents from each of us for something that will last, I don’t know, thousands of years.”

    That’s interesting that you put it that way. Recently I’ve been having thoughts of what this area will look like in 100 years. 500 years. 1000 years. What will be left?

    The obelisk marker may be here, the bricks may still be around, but the rest won’t.

    Will the world be decimated by then? Wasteland that was bombed out by a meteor/cometary impact? Buried under 100 feet of ice and snow? Grown over with grass and forest taking the land back over again the way it should be? Some super high tech urban metropolis? But maybe under a protective dome because the atmosphere is no longer breathable or because the climate outside is not tolerable? Will this obelisk become a future archaeological ancient ruin that the next species of human tries to figure out? “They had rudimentary time tracking capabilities as evidenced by this stone fixture that works in conjunction with the sun. We theorize that this area was a gathering place of some sort based on the remnants of what appears to be bricked and paved roads that our archaelogists discovered buried under the surface.” :D

    Makes me wonder….

  • Robert January 27th, 2011 | 8:28 am

    Yes, Boo!
    In keeping with the lost-time-capsule theme, we could re-use the Citizen’s Bank facade to create a 2001: A Space Odyssey monument…
    or build black boxes around those shameful, 1920’s, Jim Crow monuments.
    “World Ass City” gets to me.

  • Antoinette W. Roades January 27th, 2011 | 10:41 am

    Dave:

    Just want to correct your identification of me as a “long-time city resident.” That would make me one of many who came here at some point and decided to stay a while. In fact, I’m a native of Charlottesville (the City, not the area) — to which my father’s family arrived in 1859 and my mother’s family arrived in 1868.

    By noting that difference I’m not trying to pull rank. In a way, I’m doing the opposite. Often, my fellow complainers in these threads conclude their comments by saying something like, “Time to move on.” Given what’s going on here, I have to envy their sense of mobility.

    For 16 years, I lived and worked elsewhere — in Richmond, Middleburg, Washington DC, Bucks County PA, and New York City. But I’ve always voted here. And when I came back and found much changed — in some respects for better, in others for far worse — I didn’t have the option of not caring.

    I’m not alone in this regard. Plenty of us hereabout are cumbered by long personal memories further extended by forbears’ experiences and, in cases like mine, by primary-source research. So we can’t help grieving for days when local elected officials saw themselves first and foremost as stewards of public resources rather than individuals privileged to pursue pet projects at public expense.

    Public art? Yes it’s important. And thanks to private generosity we have multiple world-class examples. Meanwhile, I have to think about the acres of art threatened or actually destroyed by the City’s reprehensible neglect of public cemeteries. Not just burying grounds, they’re also three-dimensional historical documents (which is to say, true timepieces), valuable parks, and wonderfully varied sculpture gardens. Once — can you imagine? — the City payroll included full time custodians who not only took meticulous care of their beautiful and fragile inventories, but served as ad hoc guides to visitors. Now, however, City “care” consists of hiring outside contractors whose way-too-heavily-equipped workers do as much or more damage than the freelance vandals who labor unchecked under cover of night. The result is both heartbreaking and infuriating.

    Seeing such things makes me wish desperately that I could “move on.” But even if I had the means to acquire a new address, it wouldn’t help because Charlottesville would still be home.

  • confused easily January 27th, 2011 | 10:44 am

    Antoinette: how is it that you get to vote in Cville during a 16 year period in which you “lived and worked elsewhere”? Sounds like voter fraud to me.

  • Dave McNair January 27th, 2011 | 10:51 am

    Antoinette,

    I stand corrected. Thanks for pointing that out. And kudos to you posting under your real name. We wish more people would do the same.

    Dave

  • Ken C. and the rest of the AG's Office January 27th, 2011 | 10:56 am

    Antoinette:

    I agree with Dave. We really appreciate the use of your real name. We’ll be in touch soon about that voting stuff.

  • Daniel January 27th, 2011 | 11:23 am

    Cville Eye and Hoover are missing the point. You read 25K and think, “hmm … I could use that to build a new deck. Would I rather have a deck or a weird obelisk?” But you’re using a household finance benchmark to judge a whole city of 40 thousand people (and more if you consider tourists and other folks throughout the region who may enjoy this and spend more money here). That’s why I broke it down to 60 cents a person. You’re complaining about spending 60 cents.

  • boooo! January 27th, 2011 | 11:49 am

    @Daniel

    Everybody contributes 60 cents, it eventually adds up to a nice chunk of money like $25K……….and then it’s thrown away.

    It doesn’t matter if everybody contributed $5.00, $1.75, 60 cents or a penny. All that matters is the final grand total that was gathered up and how that final grand total chunk was utilized. Was it utilized towards something useful, practical and worthwhile, benefitting the community and its residents in some way, or was it thrown away on something stupid?

    So I think you’re the one missing the point here. But that’s just my opinion.

  • Antoinette W. Roades January 27th, 2011 | 11:59 am

    confused easily, et al.:

    Both as an individual and as a reporter who has covered voting matters in various jurisdictions, I know that there’s nothing remotely unusual about retaining a voting address in the place one considers home. I did not consider myself a permanent resident of any other place I lived. I did not own property in any of those places. I did not have a family base where the bulk of my belongings were stashed in any of them. As far as I was concerned, I was just passing through — which proved to be the case every time. And in gaps between new assignments, I did indeed live here. That’s the same reason I retained my Virginia driver’s license.

    As you would know if you’d followed such issues over the years, people who’ve made the opposite decision have often found themselves the subject of legal scrutiny. For instance, at various times students have sought to register to vote where they attend school only to be told that they cannot be considered legal residents of anywhere but their hometowns. Courts continue to grapple with such matters.

    (Actually, I covered such a case in College Park MD decades ago. Several University of Maryland students sued for and were granted the right to register locally. I called two of them the morning after Election Day to ask about their experiences. It turned out that both had slept through their sought after opportunity. Sic transit democracy.)

    Ex White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel is in a much too interesting (from his point of view) variant of this situation at this moment. Although he moved to Washington in 2009, he continued to vote in Chicago. Now that he’s gone home to run for Mayor, he’s being told by a judicial panel that he’s ineligible to run because his absence disqualified him as a legal resident of his native city (where he also owns a house, albeit one rented out). But there’s been no mention — even in what is indisputably one of the most combative political venues in the country — of his having voted illegally over the last couple of years. And that’s because he didn’t.

    I’m afraid, troops, that you just don’t have a case. But don’t let that prevent you from heckling me. Hey, not only do I post under my real name, I’m in the phonebook, too. Just think. You could make anonymous calls and say rude things. You could even sneak up after dark and throw something at my fence. The possibilities are truly endless.

  • Daniel January 27th, 2011 | 12:41 pm

    @ boo.

    Sure, let’s discuss how money should be spent to benefit the community. All I’m saying is that, in order to do this well, we need to really understand what the costs are. My hunch is that folks see the number in the headline, imagine what they could spend 25K on personally, and then immediately break into the aggrieved taxpayer dance. It really does look wasteful that way. The fact that Cville Eye and Hoover responded by suggesting that I pay it myself confirmed my suspicion.

    I’m not giving an answer, just setting up the question: “Is it worth 60 cents to you?” not “is it worth 25K to you?” That’s a big difference.

  • cookieJar January 27th, 2011 | 1:20 pm

    Antoinette, are you sure you don’t want to be a city councilor?

  • Hoover January 27th, 2011 | 1:38 pm

    @Daniel: The deck will have to wait. I was thinking more along the lines of macaroni and cheese, milk and bread. Get a grip.

  • Daniel January 27th, 2011 | 2:08 pm

    @ Hoover: I have to watch my pennies too. The good news is that we will have to pay quite a bit less than 60 cents for the clock, because our assessed property values are below average (or the taxes for the rental unit that’s passed on as part of the rent).

  • Old Timer January 27th, 2011 | 2:14 pm

    @Hoover,

    “I was thinking more along the lines of macaroni and cheese, milk and bread.”

    You can buy a box of dried Macaroni and powdered cheese for 60 cents.

    Personally I would rather see the 25k go towards the AshLawn Opera, or a more pleasant place than the Pavillion for small local brass concerts. That sort of art.

  • Angel Eyes January 27th, 2011 | 2:50 pm

    It’s a waste of public funds, even though small compared to other monies squandered on dumb projects. It will at least provide a nice smooth easel for local street artists to tag.
    I’m just surprised they didn’t pay $150K to some consultant to do a “feasibility study”.

  • confused easily January 27th, 2011 | 3:33 pm

    Why isn’t the City requiring that this obelisk be constructed out of sustainably harvested granite?

  • Biff Diggerance January 27th, 2011 | 3:54 pm

    Antoinette you’ve got world-class cojones, eloquent prose, factual arguments, and deep love for Charlottesville. Count me in your fan club.

    Daniel for just pennies a day you can…[fill in with any sucker-oriented commercial copy]. It’s not the personal stake in the $25K; it’s the amount in the aggregate that matters. Imagine the alternatives for that money! Why just think we could have a visitor from France, Bulgaria, Ghana, and Romania come here and walk up and down the mall with Dave Norris, and still have money left over for 20″ x 24″ sister city flags to hang in the world’s least practical bus terminal.

  • confused easily January 27th, 2011 | 3:55 pm

    Biff: does that lunch counter in the bus terminal still serve goat meat? At least the visitor from Ghana would feel right at home.

  • bill marshall January 27th, 2011 | 6:58 pm

    All art should be donated. Individual Artists should not be supported by the taxpayers. They should get a job and do their craft on evenings and weekends like 90% already do. I would imagine if the city solicited artwork donations they would be given a wonderful array of choices. If private foundations wish to subsidize it then they can submit their offer also. There is no reason for society to subsidize a business plan that does not work. There are lots of carpenters and house painters who cannot survive in this economy and we do not subsidize them.

    Having the fruits of your labor viewd by hundreds of people daily should be enough satisfaction for anyone. Especially if it leads to retail work. Kind of like radio stations don’t have to pay to play songs. The exposure has proven to be payment enough.

    Charlottesville could learn a lesson from the Kluge fiasco.

  • JennSilv January 27th, 2011 | 7:40 pm

    radio stations do pay to play songs

    http://www.bmi.com/licensing/radio/

    Mr.Kluge did very well fo himself owning Metromedia which pad royalties of all sorts to creative people for their work

    i don’think the sundial is a good idea though

  • Restore the Republic January 28th, 2011 | 12:01 am

    “Why isn’t the City requiring that this obelisk be constructed out of sustainably harvested granite?”

    Dang, confused easily, I was wondering the very same thing. And I also wonder why it is not free of bovine growth hormone, genetic modification, grown free range with no MSG, and hydroponically nurtured. Perhaps it could even be started in a little pot with heirloom seeds as well. And bio fuel should be used to get it to Charlottesviille with solar cells as auxiliary and back up power. Then only a few carbon credits need be paid to Al Gore.

    Can you say: Sustainably Harvested Cranium?

Leave a reply

* People say the darndest things, but language stronger than "darn," insulting words like "stupid," ethnically or racially disparaging language, and comparing people to Hitler usually results in deletion of the comment and may get you blocked from further commenting. Ditto for posting unverified and/or potentially libelous allegations, and even off-topic digression. And to avoid spam, any comment containing more than two weblinks gets eaten by Bigfoot.

Comments for this post will be closed on 24 February 2011.

login | Contents ©2009 The HooK